Series 66 Laws, Regulations, and Ethics Practice Questions

  1. Question 1

    An investment adviser representative working at a local office for an SEC-registered advisory firm gives individualized advice to retail clients. Which registration question should be analyzed?

    • A. The firm's SEC registration covers its personnel, because states lack authority to register individuals who work for SEC-registered firms.
    • B. The representative must register in the state where the employer is incorporated, rather than where the representative works with clients.
    • C. State registration does not apply to employees of SEC-registered firms, because federal law preempts state regulation of their individual advisers.
    • D. State IAR registration may apply based on place of business and federal/state definitions and exemptions.
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: D. State IAR registration may apply based on place of business and federal/state definitions and exemptions.

    States may register IARs of federal covered advisers who have a place of business in the state, subject to definitions and exclusions. Firm and individual registration are separate matters.

    • A. States can register individual IARs even when the firm is SEC-registered.
    • B. IAR registration turns on place of business, not the employer's state of incorporation.
    • C. Preemption covers the adviser firm; it does not bar state IAR registration.
    • D. Place of business and the applicable definitions and exclusions drive IAR registration.
  2. Question 2

    A customer, without any recommendation or solicitation from her broker-dealer, calls in and requests to purchase shares of a specific security that is not registered or otherwise exempt in the state. Under the Uniform Securities Act, this transaction is:

    • A. Exempt only if the customer is an institutional investor
    • B. Not exempt because the underlying security itself is not registered
    • C. Not exempt because the broker-dealer processed the order
    • D. Exempt as an unsolicited brokerage transaction
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: D. Exempt as an unsolicited brokerage transaction

    An unsolicited order — one initiated entirely by the customer without any recommendation or solicitation by the broker-dealer or its agent — is an exempt transaction under the USA, regardless of whether the underlying security itself is registered. This exemption protects execution-only order flow from being blocked by the registration status of the security.

    • A. Incorrect — the unsolicited exemption isn't limited to institutional investors; it applies to any customer-initiated, non-recommended order.
    • B. Incorrect — the exemption applies precisely because the trade was unsolicited; the underlying security's registration status doesn't defeat this transaction-level exemption.
    • C. Incorrect — merely processing a customer-initiated order doesn't remove the exemption; what matters is that the broker-dealer didn't recommend or solicit the trade.
    • D. Correct — an unsolicited transaction, where the customer initiates the purchase without any recommendation from the broker-dealer, is exempt from the Act's registration requirements even if the security itself isn't registered.
  3. Question 3

    An investment adviser with $150 million in regulatory assets under management is generally required to register with which regulator?

    • A. The SEC, as a federal covered adviser
    • B. FINRA, as a broker-dealer
    • C. Both the SEC and every state in which it has even a single client, with no exemption available
    • D. Only the state(s) where it has a place of business
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A. The SEC, as a federal covered adviser

    Investment advisers with regulatory assets under management at or above the federal covered adviser threshold (generally $100 million, with certain buffer provisions) must register with the SEC rather than with individual states and are known as federal covered advisers. Smaller advisers typically register at the state level instead.

    • A. Correct — $150 million AUM places the adviser above the federal covered adviser threshold, requiring SEC registration.
    • B. Incorrect — this is an investment adviser, not a broker-dealer; FINRA registration is not the applicable requirement.
    • C. Incorrect — federal covered status generally preempts full state registration; states may only require notice filing, not full dual registration in every client's state.
    • D. Incorrect — at this AUM level the adviser is a federal covered adviser and registers with the SEC, not state-by-state.
  4. Considering a career as an advisor?

    Explore careers at Parsonex
  5. Question 4

    A client approves a one-time purchase of $5,000 in a stock but the IAR later sells unrelated holdings without seeking authority. The adviser says the earlier trade shows general consent. What is the correct distinction?

    • A. Authority for a specific transaction does not necessarily confer discretion over future securities or timing decisions.
    • B. Advisory accounts are treated as discretionary by operation of law once the client signs an advisory agreement with the firm.
    • C. Discretion is a feature of accounts holding options or other complex products, and a plain stock purchase approval would not create it for an account.
    • D. Delivery of a trade confirmation after the sale gives the client notice, so the client's silence retroactively authorizes the transaction.
    Show answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A. Authority for a specific transaction does not necessarily confer discretion over future securities or timing decisions.

    Discretion requires authority and documentation from the client. Approving one trade is transaction-specific consent and does not extend to later securities or timing choices.

    • A. One-time approval of a specific trade does not grant ongoing discretion.
    • B. Advisory accounts are discretionary only when the client grants authority.
    • C. Discretion depends on the client's grant of authority, not the type of holding.
    • D. A confirmation or silence does not retroactively authorize an unauthorized trade.

More Laws, Regulations, and Ethics questions

Practice Laws, Regulations, and Ethics

More Series 66 topics

All Series 66 practice exam details