Series 63 Administrative Provisions and Enforcement Practice Questions
Question 1
A broker-dealer sends a client a written rescission offer that otherwise satisfies the Uniform Securities Act's requirements. Under which of the following circumstances is the client's right to sue for the underlying violation extinguished?
- A. The client cashes any dividend checks received on the security
- B. The client fails to file a written rejection of the offer within 10 days
- C. The broker-dealer sends the offer within 3 years of the sale, since the timing of the offer is what controls
- D. The client fails to accept the written offer within 30 days of receiving it
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. The client fails to accept the written offer within 30 days of receiving it
A compliant written rescission offer must state the consideration to be paid (or other relief) and give the offeree a reasonable period — 30 days — to accept. If the client fails to accept within that 30-day window, the right to sue for that violation is extinguished, provided the offer otherwise met the statutory requirements and no suit was already pending.
- A. Receiving ordinary dividend payments doesn't equate to accepting or rejecting the rescission offer, so it doesn't extinguish the client's right to sue.
- B. There's no requirement that the client affirmatively file a written rejection within 10 days — the operative event is failing to accept within the offer's stated period.
- C. What matters is the client's failure to accept within the offer's stated period, not when the broker-dealer sent the offer relative to the sale.
- D. Correct. If the client fails to accept a compliant written rescission offer within the specified period (30 days), the right to sue for the underlying violation is extinguished.
Question 2
An applicant for agent registration has an otherwise clean record. Which of the following, standing alone, is NOT a statutory ground on which the Administrator could deny the application?
- A. The applicant was convicted of a securities-related felony within the past 10 years
- B. The applicant is currently enjoined by a court from engaging in the securities business
- C. The applicant completed a two-year college program rather than a four-year degree
- D. The application contains a materially false statement
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. The applicant completed a two-year college program rather than a four-year degree
The Act enumerates specific grounds for denial — felony or relevant misdemeanor convictions within the statutory look-back period, injunctions, insolvency, failure to supervise, dishonest or unethical practices, and material misstatements in the application, among others. Educational attainment or degree type is not among these enumerated grounds and cannot by itself support denial.
- A. A securities-related felony conviction within the statutory lookback period is an explicit statutory ground for denial.
- B. Being currently enjoined from engaging in the securities business is an explicit statutory ground for denial.
- C. Correct. Educational attainment (a two-year versus four-year degree) is not a statutory ground on which the Administrator can deny an application.
- D. A materially false statement in the application is an explicit statutory ground for denial.
Question 3
Under the Uniform Securities Act's civil liability provisions, what remedy is available to a purchaser who still owns a security that was sold to them in violation of the Act?
- A. Tendering the security back in exchange for the consideration originally paid, plus interest at the legal rate, less any income received on the security
- B. Punitive damages equal to three times the original purchase price
- C. The greater of actual damages or a fixed statutory penalty of $10,000
- D. An order compelling the seller to hold the security in trust indefinitely for the purchaser's benefit
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Tendering the security back in exchange for the consideration originally paid, plus interest at the legal rate, less any income received on the security
The USA's civil liability remedy for a purchaser who still holds the security is rescission: the purchaser tenders the security back to the seller in exchange for the consideration paid, plus interest at the legal rate from the date of payment, minus any income (e.g., dividends) received on the security during the holding period. If the purchaser no longer owns the security, the remedy shifts to damages measured similarly.
- A. Correct. Where the purchaser still holds the security, the civil liability remedy is rescission: tendering the security back for the amount originally paid plus interest at the legal rate, less any income received on it.
- B. The Act's civil liability provisions are compensatory/rescissory in nature, not punitive; there's no treble-damages remedy built into Section 410.
- C. There is no fixed statutory penalty option here; the remedy is calculated based on actual consideration paid and interest, not a flat $10,000 figure.
- D. The Act doesn't impose an indefinite constructive trust remedy; the purchaser's remedy while still holding the security is tender-and-refund, not compelled indefinite trusteeship.
Considering a career as an advisor?
Explore careers at ParsonexQuestion 4
An Administrator who reasonably believes a person is about to violate the Uniform Securities Act may:
- A. Refer the matter to the attorney general for criminal prosecution, since the Administrator lacks authority to issue administrative orders directly
- B. Act after obtaining prior concurrence from the SEC, since state action against threatened violations is subject to federal approval
- C. Take no action until an actual, completed violation occurs
- D. Issue a cease-and-desist order without first having to obtain a court injunction
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Issue a cease-and-desist order without first having to obtain a court injunction
The Administrator has independent authority to issue a cease-and-desist order to stop threatened or ongoing violations without first needing to obtain a court injunction (though injunctive relief may also be separately available through the courts).
- A. Incorrect — the Administrator has its own direct administrative enforcement authority and need not route the matter through the attorney general.
- B. Incorrect — no SEC concurrence is required for state administrative action.
- C. Incorrect — the Administrator can act on a reasonable belief that a violation is about to occur, not only after the fact.
- D. Correct.
More Administrative Provisions and Enforcement questions
Practice Administrative Provisions and EnforcementMore Series 63 topics
- Antifraud Provisions
- Broker-Dealer and Agent Registration
- Client Types and Compensation
- Fiduciary Duty
- Investment Adviser Registration
- Post-Registration Requirements
- Prohibited Communications
- Suitability and Communications
- Unethical Practices: Broker-Dealers and Agents
- Unethical Practices: Investment Advisers