Series 63 Fiduciary Duty Practice Questions
Question 1
An investment adviser directs client trades to a particular broker-dealer that provides the adviser with valuable research and other soft-dollar benefits, even though the broker-dealer's execution quality and commission rates are not the most favorable available. Under the adviser's fiduciary duty, this arrangement:
- A. Is always a breach of fiduciary duty and is prohibited under all circumstances
- B. Is permissible without any disclosure because soft-dollar arrangements are a private matter between the adviser and broker-dealer
- C. May be permissible only if the adviser discloses the soft-dollar arrangement and reasonably determines the client received execution and services of value consistent with best-execution obligations, given the totality of circumstances
- D. Is only a concern for broker-dealers, not investment advisers
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. May be permissible only if the adviser discloses the soft-dollar arrangement and reasonably determines the client received execution and services of value consistent with best-execution obligations, given the totality of circumstances
Soft-dollar arrangements are not automatically prohibited, but they implicate the adviser's fiduciary duty of best execution. An adviser directing brokerage in exchange for research/benefits must disclose the practice and be able to reasonably justify that the client received execution and services of overall value consistent with best-execution obligations — not simply the lowest available commission in isolation.
- A. Incorrect — soft-dollar arrangements aren't automatically prohibited; they're permissible under disclosed, justified conditions.
- B. Incorrect — nondisclosure would itself be a fiduciary breach given the conflict of interest involved.
- C. Correct — disclosure plus a reasonable best-execution determination is required.
- D. Incorrect — best execution and soft-dollar disclosure obligations apply squarely to investment advisers exercising brokerage discretion.
Question 2
On March 2, a client gives her agent full discretionary trading authority over her account by telephone, without signing anything. The agent begins placing discretionary trades that same day. Under the Uniform Securities Act, by what point must the broker-dealer obtain written authorization for this full discretionary authority?
- A. Full discretionary authority can never be granted orally under any circumstances, even temporarily.
- B. Within 30 calendar days of the account being opened.
- C. There is no deadline as long as the client eventually signs an authorization before account termination.
- D. Within 10 business days of the first discretionary transaction, i.e., by roughly March 16.
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D. Within 10 business days of the first discretionary transaction, i.e., by roughly March 16.
A broker-dealer may accept oral grant of full discretionary authority for a short bridge period, but must reduce it to writing within 10 business days of the first discretionary trade. After that window, continued discretionary trading without written authorization is a violation.
- A. Oral discretionary authority is permitted temporarily — it isn't categorically barred, so long as it's followed by timely written confirmation.
- B. The 30-day window relates to account opening generally, not the specific deadline for confirming discretionary authority in writing after trading begins.
- C. There is a specific deadline for obtaining written authorization; it isn't open-ended until account termination.
- D. Correct. Written authorization for the full discretionary authority must generally be obtained within 10 business days of the first discretionary transaction, i.e., roughly by March 16.
Question 3
Under the Uniform Securities Act and the Investment Advisers Act, what standard of conduct governs the relationship between an investment adviser and its clients?
- A. Best execution, since the adviser's duty is met by obtaining favorable prices on client trades
- B. Reasonable-basis suitability, identical to the standard applied to registered representatives of broker-dealers and their principals
- C. Utmost good faith, full and fair disclosure of material facts, and loyalty and care in the client's best interest
- D. Contractual performance limited to the terms expressly stated in the advisory agreement
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Utmost good faith, full and fair disclosure of material facts, and loyalty and care in the client's best interest
Investment advisers are fiduciaries under both the Uniform Securities Act and the SEC's interpretation of the Investment Advisers Act. That status imposes an affirmative duty of utmost good faith, full and fair disclosure of all material facts, and an obligation to act with undivided loyalty and reasonable care in the client's best interest, not merely a contractual or transaction-level standard.
- A. Best execution is only one component of the fiduciary duty, not the whole standard — advisers owe broader duties of disclosure, loyalty, and care.
- B. The adviser standard exceeds mere reasonable-basis suitability; it's a fiduciary duty, a higher standard than what applies to broker-dealer registered representatives and their principals.
- C. Correct. Investment advisers are held to a fiduciary standard of utmost good faith, full and fair disclosure of material facts, and loyalty and care in the client's best interest.
- D. The duty isn't limited to the advisory agreement's express terms — fiduciary obligations exist independent of and beyond contractual language.
Considering a career as an advisor?
Explore careers at ParsonexQuestion 4
All of the following are consistent with an investment adviser's fiduciary duty to clients EXCEPT:
- A. Disclosing conflicts of interest that could reasonably affect the advice given
- B. Seeking best execution of client transactions
- C. Guaranteeing a minimum rate of return to retain a client relationship
- D. Placing client interests ahead of the adviser's own interests
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. Guaranteeing a minimum rate of return to retain a client relationship
Guaranteeing a specific or minimum performance result is a prohibited practice under the Uniform Securities Act and NASAA model rules, since investment returns cannot be assured and such guarantees are inherently misleading. Disclosure of conflicts, seeking best execution, and prioritizing client interests are all affirmative components of the duty of loyalty and care.
- A. Disclosing conflicts of interest is a core fiduciary obligation, consistent with (not an exception to) the duty owed to clients.
- B. Seeking best execution is a routine fiduciary obligation an adviser owes clients when handling their transactions, entirely consistent with fiduciary duty.
- C. Correct. Guaranteeing a minimum rate of return is a prohibited practice — no adviser can ensure investment performance — making it inconsistent with (the exception to) fiduciary duty rather than an expression of it.
- D. Placing client interests ahead of the adviser's own is the definitional core of fiduciary duty, not an exception to it.
More Fiduciary Duty questions
Practice Fiduciary DutyMore Series 63 topics
- Administrative Provisions and Enforcement
- Antifraud Provisions
- Broker-Dealer and Agent Registration
- Client Types and Compensation
- Investment Adviser Registration
- Post-Registration Requirements
- Prohibited Communications
- Suitability and Communications
- Unethical Practices: Broker-Dealers and Agents
- Unethical Practices: Investment Advisers